[jarrod2323]

All Members should pick one winner in each category. Judges will grade accordingly after PM'd.

- Music -
A:
B:

- Models -
A:
B:

- Movies -
A:
B:

- Olympics -
A:
B:

- College -
A:
B: NONE

[Gtown81]

ABABA

[SiCKNESS™]

ABAAA

[Rios15]

Why do I always get such a tough match-up.

[Pugz]

ABABA

Amanda and Scarlett are soooo sexy!

[.loggie]

BBBBA
the first matchup was tough but that second sig is dope as fukk

[.truth]

ABBBA

[RedBull™]

rios which was yours?

ABBBA

[Rios15]

I'm not supposed to reveal so...

[.snowy]

9 - If this sig had a different font and the text was blended in sligtly better..then it would have been a 10.
10 - No complaints. Literally lol.

7.5 - Nice, simple, just too much blank energy and space.
8.5 - Graphically and conceptually very solid, however it just seems a bit flat, despite the duped renders.

8 - The middle blended in render doesn't really work in this case, not liking the Johannson text however.
8 - Nice colours, lighting and flow. The white boxes and lines don't really fit.

8 - Much like last week, the font and text overall dont match the feel off the whole sig. The text is nice, the rest of the sig is nice, however they dont match each other.
8.5 - becoming a bit played out unfortuantely, render doesn't stand out enough. Still very strong.

7 - Too simple, too basic. Freshen it up a bit with a couple of shapes or stocks.

[McCoy4Heisman]

AABBA

[collyflower]

ABABA

[jarrod2323]

bump for votes, plz

[HTF]

ABBBA

[jarrod2323]

I AM SO SORRY ABOUT THIS - got caught up in MLB Sim draft and getting things ready for the Playoffs

9 - wow. great effects on a B&W sig. only complaints are more emphasis on lighting for the flow
8.5 - definitely not on same page with snowy on this. to me, this is lacking depth in the BG on the left, and the size should be larger. good flow and render/text effects, however

7 - improvement over previous work, but still lacking true gfx creativity on a manip
8.5 - Love the effects on render and bg. text effects are a bit difficult to decipher, or this would be a higher score

9 - probably coulda left the Johansson text off, but I like the creativity and differentiation from other styles that are being used
8.5 - good middle, but sides are lacking development. push the effects outward, and score is easily higher. blue a bit strong on her neck

8 - Much like last week, the font and text overall dont match the feel off the whole sig. The text is nice, the rest of the sig is nice, however they dont match each other.
8.5 - render is hidden behind the effects, but text and bg effects good as usual

6.5 - more needed on this manip. simple text and stock overlay are not creative enough to get higher scores

[jarrod2323]

Member voting counted 1/3, with judges 2/3. Final individual score is out of a possible 100

Velvet Hammers vs. Team Balla

Competition 1
A=Velvet Hammers Baggino 8/9=88.9% 9+.5=9.5 = 29.34+63.65=>92.99
B=Team Balla Crush 1/9=11.1% 9.25+.5=9.75 = 3.67+65.33=>69.00

Competition 2
A=Team Balla Rios15 1/9=11.1% 7.25+.5=7.75 = 3.67+51.93=>55.60
B=Velvet Hammers _roboy 8/9=88.9% 8.5+1.5=10 = 29.34+67=>96.34

Competition 3
A=Team Balla Pac-Div 4/9=44.4% 8.5+.5=9 = 14.65+60.3=>74.95
B=Velvet Hammers NjNets15 5/9=55.6% 8.25+1.5=9.75 = 18.35+65.33=>83.68

Competition 4
A=Velvet Hammers DCpwner 1/9=11.1% 8+1.5=9.5 = 3.67+63.65=>67.32
B=Team Balla nba_balla 8/9=88.9% 8.5+.5=9 = 29.34+60.3=>89.64

Competition 5
A=Velvet Hammers SG89 9/9=100% 6.75+1.5=8.25 = 33+55.28=>88.28
B=Team Balla NONE

Velvet Hammers=92.99+96.34+83.68+67.32+88.28=428.61 85.72
Team Balla=69.00+55.60+74.95+89.64+0=289.19 57.84

Velvet Hammers is the Victor

[Rios15]

That sucks, my best sig doesn't get the win.